A bill introduced in Scotland aims to make conversations occurring in private homes illegal if they are deemed to promote “hatred,” The Times of London reports.

Under the proposed law, journalists and theater directors will also face prosecution if their work is believed to inflame prejudice or “hatred,” according to the Times.

Members of the Scottish parliament questioned justice secretary Humza Yousaf on Tuesday about the controversial legislation, which criminalizes “hate speech” occurring in private homes relating to age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, transgender identity, and variations in sex characteristics, reports The Express.

The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Bill has been condemned by critics including the Scottish Catholic Church, police representatives, academics and artists over concerns over freedom of speech and freedom of expression. Mr Bean star Rowan Atkinson, writer Val McDermid, and BBC Scotland have all raised concerns over the legislation, reports The Express.

The bill is somewhat based on the Public Order Act of 1986 which bans threatening, abusive, or insulting words but goes a step further in getting rid of that law’s “dwelling defense.”

Yousaf told parliament that, unlike the existing law, his bill will have no “dwelling defense,” meaning people in Scotland can be prosecuted for things they say in their own homes and sitting around the kitchen table. Friends, guests, and family members could report improper conversations they overhear in private homes to authorities for investigation.

“This extraordinary plan to criminalise private conversations in the home reveals the sinister underlying motive in hate-speech laws. The state and its supporters claim these laws are needed to protect vulnerable people against ‘threatening, abusive or insulting words’. Even imposed on public discussion, such laws pose a mortal threat to the right to be offensive, a key aspect of real freedom of speech,” Mick Hume of Spiked wrote of the controversial legislation.

After answering questions before parliament, Yousaf was forced to amend the legislation in order for ensure it advances through the legislature. MSPs expressed concern over language in the bill that criminalized “stirring up hatred.”

The bill now criminalizes “stirring up offenses” instead and would be limited to “intent” relating to age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, transgender identity and variations in sex characteristics.

“The point of stirring up offenses and the reason why I think we need these offenses is their effect is or could be to motivate people who carry out acts of hatred, violence, assaults and so on against members of groups who belong to particular communities,” Yousaf said of the bill.

“What it does is if you’re stirring up religious hatred against Jews, with the intent of stirring up hatred in your private dwelling with your children in the room, with friends you’ve invited over for a dinner party if they then act upon that hatred and commit offenses that would be prosecuted by the law, should the person who with the intent of stirring up hatred if their behavior was threatening or abusive, should that person not be culpable? Should they not receive criminal sanction?” he added.

Yousaf said he was willing to look into adding protections for free speech in the legislation, but was also open to broadening protections to acts that express “antipathy, dislike, ridicule or insults,” reports The Express.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *